top of page

Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427

Facts: Listening devices had been installed on Coco’s property following orders by a Queensland judge with reference to statute. Coco argued that the listening device was invalidly installed because they were trespassing. 

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe for law study tips

Sign up with your email address to get study tips and techniques from CaseTreasury.

Thanks for submitting!

© 2024 by CaseTreasury. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page