Khamis v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 179

Facts: The complainant (C) had confided in the girlfriend of her brother in the morning after she had been sexual assaulted by the defendant (D) (the appellant). D tried to adduce evidence of a conversation he had with C indicating no sexual intercourse had taken place and the acts of intimacy had been consensual. D’s version of events had not been put in cross-examination (CE) of the complainant nor of any member of her family. The trial judge excluded the D’s evidence. 

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now