top of page

Langford v Tasmania (2018) 271 A Crim R 186

Facts: Defendant (D), a taxi driver was charged with setting fire to a taxi owned by another driver in the early hours of the morning. The case against D was circumstantial and based largely on:

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe for law study tips

Sign up with your email address to get study tips and techniques from CaseTreasury.

Thanks for submitting!

© 2024 by CaseTreasury. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page