Langford v Tasmania (2018) 271 A Crim R 186
Facts: Defendant (D), a taxi driver was charged with setting fire to a taxi owned by another driver in the early hours of the morning. The case against D was circumstantial and based largely on:
Facts: Defendant (D), a taxi driver was charged with setting fire to a taxi owned by another driver in the early hours of the morning. The case against D was circumstantial and based largely on: