LJP Investments v Howard Chia Investments (1989) 24 NSWLR 490

Facts: Defendant (D) was developing its commercial property in Sydney. D asked the plaintiff (Pl) if it could erect scaffolding over Pl’s land. Pl would only grant permission in return for payment. D refused to pay and erected scaffolding at 4.5m above the ground and 1.5m into the airspace above Pl’s property.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now