Peden v Bortolazzo [2006] 2 Qd R 574

Facts: The plaintiff (Pl) (respondent) was the occupier of premises and used it as a motel. Defendant (D) (appellant) owned an adjacent residential flat and leased it out. Pl argued D was liable for nuisance for excessive noise, smoke from burning off and unruly and drunken behaviour at all hours of the day.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now