Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR 635

Facts: Dillon and other defendants (D) were police officers who attended Plenty’s, the plaintiff’s (Pl), farm to serve his daughter a summons, alleging that the daughter was in need of care and control. They had no express or implied right to enter. Pl sued them for trespass.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now