top of page

R v Chin (1985) 157 CLR 671

Facts: Chin (Defendant; D) and Choo were tried for drug import offences; they claimed they did not know each other. Prosecution (Pr) sought to reopen their case to tender Choo’s visa application to show that they both put down the same telephone contact (showing association). The document was admitted. D was recalled for further cross-examination (CE) on the document. Choo was acquitted; but D was convicted and appealed.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe for law study tips

Sign up with your email address to get study tips and techniques from CaseTreasury.

Thanks for submitting!

© 2024 by CaseTreasury. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page