top of page

R v Egan [2017] NSWDC 356, 26 DCLR (NSW) 164 

Facts: Defendant (D) charged with unlawful killing. There was evidence of self-defence. During official questioning, he declined to answer any questions so the police interview was terminated. At trial, D relied on self-defence. The prosecution (Pr) sought direction under s 89A Evidence Act as self-defence could reasonably be expected to be mentioned during official questioning.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe for law study tips

Sign up with your email address to get study tips and techniques from CaseTreasury.

Thanks for submitting!

© 2024 by CaseTreasury. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page