Sio v The Queen [2016] HCA 32; (2016) 259 CLR 47

Facts: Defendant (D) (Sio) was convicted of armed robbery and wounding of a brothel employee. His co-D fatally stabbed someone with a knife when trying to rob the building. Prosecution (Pr) tried to compel co-D but he refused to answer any questions. They used statements made in an electronically recorded interview instead (i.e. hearsay). 

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now