Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor [1956] 1 WLR 965

Facts: Defendant (D) (Subramanian) was convicted of being in possession of ammunition. D sought to advance a defence of duress, by testifying that the terrorists threatened him and his family. The trial judge (TJ) prevented D from adducing evidence of the threats made to him by terrorists on the ground of hearsay.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now